Listen | Podcast on
Religious Business Names
Transcript
(0:00 – 0:13)
Imagine you are an 85-year-old nun living in a monastery in Kansas. You know, you live this quiet life defined by prayer, community, and pretty modest means. Right, a very traditional monastic life.
(0:13 – 0:24)
Exactly. But tomorrow morning, you have a meeting on your calendar to force the board of directors at Google to change how they build artificial intelligence. It honestly sounds like the premise of a movie.
(0:25 – 0:28)
It really does. Yeah. But how on earth did you get that meeting? Yeah.
(0:28 – 0:50)
And, more importantly, why do they have to listen to you? Well, it’s a very real and incredibly powerful dynamic that’s, you know, happening in boardrooms right now. Right. And the answer to how that nun got her meeting lies in this $56 billion web, a web that connects ancient mythologies, Wall Street, and the actual apps sitting on your phone right at this very second.
(0:50 – 1:03)
Yeah. Companies are actively using these ancient religious and mythological names to build modern empires. And at the exact same time, the world’s largest religious organizations are quietly buying up billions of dollars in stock in those exact same companies.
(1:03 – 2:19)
We are essentially looking at an ecosystem where the ancient world and the modern stock market aren’t just overlapping. They are fueling one another in this massive loop of capital and belief. So our mission for this deep dive is to decode that loop for you.
We’re going to explore the psychological power of mythological branding across major industries, like why your brain implicitly trusts a product named after a god. Which is fascinating in itself. And then we’re going to follow the money.
We’ll reveal the multi-billion dollar faith-based funds and that unexpected group of activist nuns who are using the mechanics of capitalism to enforce their worldview. It’s a wild ride. Okay, let’s unpack this, starting with the branding itself.
Because building a company from zero is notoriously brutal. Well, it’s the single highest hurdle a new business faces by far. I mean, when you launch a brand, you have zero trust.
You have zero recognition in the market. You’re just a nobody. Exactly.
You are asking consumers to take a massive leap of faith on an unknown entity. So by tapping into mythology or religion, a company is essentially attempting to bypass that initial really painful growth phase entirely. It’s like downloading thousands of years of brand equity for free.
(2:19 – 2:42)
Yes, that is the perfect way to conceptualize it. Because you don’t even have to explain what your product does if the name you choose already triggers the exact subconscious emotion you want the listener to feel. Right.
And when you look at the psychology behind this, the strategy delivers a few distinct immediate benefits. First is that instant recognition. You don’t have to educate the public on what the name Athena implies.
(2:42 – 3:00)
Right. That cultural software is already installed in their brains. Exactly.
And second is built in trust. These names just feel timeless and authoritative. Third, they are incredibly sticky, like a mythological name is vastly easier to remember than some random mashup of syllables generated by a tech startup.
(3:00 – 3:06)
Which happens a lot these days. So much. And finally, they provide the sense of aspiration and community connection.
(3:06 – 3:31)
Which perfectly explains why this is so hyper prevalent in the tech industry specifically. I mean, tech products are inherently invisible. Right.
You can’t touch them. Exactly. You can’t hold a cloud database in your hand.
You can’t touch a software protocol. So these companies are desperate for names that anchor their invisible products to tangible concepts of intelligence or speed or reliability. Just look at the heavy hitters in this space.
(3:32 – 3:41)
You have Oracle, which is named after a divine messenger. For a database management company, that perfectly communicates the idea of foresight and absolute knowledge. Oh, that makes total sense.
(3:41 – 3:59)
And then Amazon Web Services, they use Athena, the Greek goddess of wisdom, to position their analytics products as inherently smart and strategic. Then you have Apollo, which is used by GraphQL. That leans into the god of prophecy and the arts to imply, you know, vision and elegance and coding.
(3:59 – 4:10)
Yeah, elegance is key there. Or Prometheus, which is a major open source monitoring tool. And Prometheus was the titan who famously stole fire from the gods and gave it to humanity.
(4:10 – 4:15)
Just such a strong image. Right. For a tech tool, that signals disruptive innovation.
(4:16 – 4:21)
It means bringing light to the dark. And frankly, it just sounds bold. It projects immense power.
(4:21 – 4:56)
I do want to stop you there, though, because looking at the landscape of tech names in our sources, one of them completely threw me. Oh, which one? Kali Linux. It’s a very popular operating system named after Kali, the Hindu goddess of destruction and time.
Doesn’t naming a software product after destruction completely contradict the whole idea of building a safe, trustworthy brand? Well, what’s fascinating here is that context dictates the psychology. You have to look at what Kali Linux actually does, mechanically speaking. It is an operating system built specifically for cybersecurity and penetration testing.
(4:56 – 5:05)
Right. And for anyone outside of IT, penetration testing is basically when a company hires a friendly hacker to try and break into their own systems just to see where the weak spots are. Yeah.
(5:05 – 5:13)
Right. Like hiring a burglar to check your locks. Precisely.
Its entire purpose is to stress test networks. To break through firewalls. To find the vulnerabilities before the bad guys do.
(5:14 – 5:23)
Oh, I see. So in that highly specific niche, destruction conveys exactly what the user is shopping for. They want an immense, uncompromising power.
(5:24 – 5:49)
They want a transformative force that can relentlessly tear down weak, poorly designed systems so they can be rebuilt stronger. Wow. OK.
They aren’t selling the safety itself. They’re selling the ultimate weapon used to test that safety. Exactly.
That completely flips it. The emotion of the mythological name matches the exact utility of the product. And if you apply that same mechanism to the high stakes world of health care, the strategy adapts beautifully.
(5:49 – 5:57)
In health care, trust isn’t just a marketing buzzword. It is a literal matter of life or death. Patients are at their absolute most vulnerable.
(5:57 – 6:19)
Right. So the branding strips away anything aggressive and leans as heavily as possible into healing, wisdom and holistic balance. We see platforms like Athena Health, which is a massive electronic health records network.
Again, invoking the goddess of medicine and wisdom to feel authoritative, yet deeply caring. Exactly. Or Apollo 247, a widespread telehealth service.
(6:19 – 6:57)
They invoke the god of healing to instill immediate confidence when, say, a patient needs a doctor at 2 in the morning. And it expands beyond clinical medicine into the broader wellness industry, too. Oh, absolutely.
You have apps like Aura Health tapping into the concept of a spiritual energy field or platforms named Karma invoking the Hindu concept of cause and effect, which appeals perfectly to users seeking mental balance and intentionality in their daily habits. It’s all about setting the right psychological stage before the user even clicks download. OK, so slapping the name Athena on a cloud database or a telehealth app makes sense because those services are digital.
(6:57 – 7:20)
They’re invisible. But what happens when the product is something you can actually touch? Does the mythology illusion break down when you’re chewing on a snack or driving a tractor on a farm? It actually becomes more grounded in the physical realm. The focus just shifts from abstract digital concepts like foresight to tangible physical promises like purity or craftsmanship or even divine protection over physical labor.
(7:20 – 7:29)
The food industry is a great example of this. You have brands like Ambrosia and in Greek myth, Ambrosia is literally the food of the gods. It grants immortality.
(7:29 – 7:54)
Right. You can’t get a better endorsement than that. Exactly.
If you name your food brand Ambrosia, you are bypassing any debate about your ingredients. You are immediately implying exceptional taste, unparalleled purity and premium quality. Or take Mayowel, which is a prebiotic soda brand that uses Mesoamerican mythology, specifically the god Quetzalcoatl, to create a deeply story driven, authentic feeling beverage.
(7:55 – 8:19)
And as you move further up the supply chain to the actual agriculture sector, the dynamic shifts from just naming conventions to literal faith based ownership shaping the industry. Wait, really? How so? Well, for example, AgriServe is a massive agricultural landholding company owned entirely by the LDS church, the Mormon church. That religious backing provides a market perception of generational stability and a mission driven focus on feeding people.
(8:19 – 8:31)
I see. You also have Sanitarium, a major health food manufacturer owned by the Seventh Day Adventist church. That directly attracts consumers who are looking for ethical, health conscious manufacturing.
(8:31 – 8:45)
And it gets even more granular than that, doesn’t it? Consider Van Hoek, a company that manufactures heavy agricultural machinery. They actually name their machines after Catholic patron saints of farming. Which is brilliant marketing.
(8:45 – 8:57)
It really is. Because if you were selling a massive, expensive piece of equipment to a deeply religious farming community, naming that tractor after a patron saint isn’t just branding. It’s an immediate bridge of loyalty.
(8:58 – 9:06)
Right. It connects the grueling physical labor of farming to a higher divine purpose. And we see this connection to physical labor amplified in heavy manufacturing, too.
(9:06 – 9:19)
Think about a company like Vulcan GMS, which specializes in custom metal fabrication and casting. Vulcan is the Roman god of fire and the forge. You hear that name and you instantly picture a massive hammer hitting an anvil.
(9:20 – 9:39)
It signals an ancient, unbreakable mastery of metalworking. Or Elijah Tooling, invoking a major Hebrew prophet to imply divine purpose, truth and uncompromising precision in their engineering. But I’d argue the most profound manifestation of this in the physical world is a cultural practice in India called Vishwakarma Puja.
(9:39 – 10:00)
Oh, yeah. This was fascinating in the sources. Right.
So Vishwakarma is the Hindu divine architect, the creator of the world and all its tools. During this festival, workers on factory floors across the country literally worship their machinery, their lathes, their computers, the factory equipment itself. I want to pause on that because the psychology there is just incredible to me.
(10:00 – 10:42)
Worshiping a piece of factory machinery. It transforms the factory floor into a temple. It really does.
Think about the psychological difference between a machinist who views a metal press merely as company property versus a worker who views that exact same metal press as a divine instrument worthy of reverence. The mechanism of respect fundamentally changes. If you respect the machine as something sacred, you are going to operate it with more mindfulness.
You are going to adhere to safety protocols more strictly. You are going to maintain it better. It takes the abstract concept of a mythological brand and makes it a physical, lived reality, one that actively improves safety and productivity through a spiritual lens.
(10:42 – 10:48)
Exactly. And speaking of high risk environments, that brings us to the oil and gas industry. Oh, an incredibly dangerous field.
(10:49 – 11:10)
Billions of dollars in human lives are on the line. You have companies like Zion Oil and Gas. By naming themselves after the biblical promised land, they aren’t just creating a corporate identity.
They are explicitly attracting a very specific type of retail investor. Someone motivated by biblical prophecy regarding Israel. Yes, it is a deliberate intersection of geology and theology.
(11:10 – 11:25)
And on the logistics side, there are massive tankers navigating dangerous shipping lanes, name things like the San Salvador. When you’re sending a multi-million dollar ship into unpredictable ocean storms, invoking a Christian savior isn’t just tradition. No, it’s very practical.
(11:25 – 11:39)
It is a very human plea for divine protection at sea. It’s ancient human psychology applied directly to modern industrial supply chains. And that psychology generates massive trust, which brings us to the financial engine driving all of this.
(11:39 – 11:59)
Here’s where it gets really interesting, because if this psychological branding creates ultimate trust and trust attracts capital in the free market, who has the deepest pockets of trust based capital? Who is actually funding these monoliths? Right. Who’s writing the checks? Exactly. And the answer is the faithful themselves.
(12:00 – 12:07)
Institutional religious wealth. And the scale of the capital we are talking about here is difficult to wrap your head around. Let’s look at Ensign Peak Advisors.
(12:07 – 12:37)
This is the investment fund managing the public equities for the LDS church. OK. As our recent filings, they manage approximately 56.6 billion dollars in public equities alone.
And their strategy. It is overwhelmingly weighted toward big tech. Wait, really? Tech? Yeah.
Over 33 percent of their entire 56 billion dollar portfolio is invested in the technology sector. That is wild. They hold 7.6 percent of their entire portfolio just in Nvidia.
(12:37 – 12:56)
It’s their single largest holding. Yeah. They have almost 6 percent of Microsoft and over 3 billion dollars invested in Apple.
Plus, they’re holding massive top positions in Amazon and Alphabet. A religious institution is literally funding the infrastructure of the modern tech pantheon. And they are far from an anomaly.
(12:56 – 13:05)
The Vatican Bank, which operates under the name IOR, recently partnered with Morning Star to launch the U.S. Catholic Principles Index. Wow. Yeah.
(13:05 – 13:27)
And Giovanni Boscia, the Vatican Bank’s chief financial officer, explained that having benchmarks built on recognized Catholic ethical criteria allows them to make their financial reporting much more rigorous and transparent to their stakeholders. Wait, I need to stop you there. When I hear strict Catholic ethical criteria, I assume that severely limits what you can invest in, which would naturally limit your financial returns.
(13:27 – 13:52)
That’s a logical assumption. Yeah. Right.
But back tested over a decade, this Catholic index returned an astonishing 18 percent per year, 18 percent. And their top holdings, Meta at over 5 percent, Amazon, Nvidia, Tesla, Apple and JP Morgan. How do companies like Meta or Nvidia pass a strict Catholic ethical screen? Well, that is the crucial mechanism to understand here.
(13:53 – 14:08)
An ethical screen algorithmically is mostly about exclusion. A strict Catholic financial screen is designed to filter out companies that manufacture weapons, produce contraceptives or engage in gambling and adult entertainment. Okay.
The traditional vice stocks. Exactly. The vice stocks.
(14:08 – 14:12)
Now look at big tech. Nvidia designs microchips. Apple makes phones.
(14:12 – 14:21)
Meta builds software platforms. Because these tech companies generally do not manufacture physical vice products, they are considered ethically neutral by the screening algorithm. Oh, that makes so much sense.
(14:21 – 14:35)
Right. By simply building infrastructure and software, they accidentally become massive safe havens for algorithmic religious screeners. So because they don’t explicitly violate the rules, all this faith based capital mathematically funnels straight into them.
(14:36 – 15:16)
And we see this exact same funneling in ETS, right? We do. For anyone who is in day trading, an ETF, an exchange traded fund, is essentially a prepackaged basket of different stocks you can buy all at once, usually grouped by a specific theme. Okay.
So what are the religious ones look like? Well, you have the FIS Knights of Columbus Global Belief ETF, which trades under the ticker KOACG, managing about 29 million dollars. Then you have the massive Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF, ticker CATH, with over 1.1 billion dollars in assets. Wow.
1.1 billion. Yeah. And when you look at the top holdings of these baskets, they are nearly identical.
(15:16 – 15:24)
Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Google, Meta. It doesn’t matter what your specific theology is. The algorithmic roads all lead to big tech.
(15:24 – 16:05)
If we connect this to the bigger picture, these multibillion dollar funds aren’t necessarily investing in Amazon or Nvidia because they use mythological naming conventions like Athena or Apollo. Or it’s not a direct endorsement of the Greek pantheon. Exactly.
What we’re witnessing is an incredible systemic overlap. These tech, health and agriculture giants dominate the free market and their corporate architecture naturally passes the broad ethical screens of these religious funds. So you have a global situation where companies use ancient religious concepts to build their brand trust and modern religious organizations generate massive compound wealth by passively investing in that exact same trust.
(16:05 – 16:21)
It is a perfectly closed loop. But, you know, not all religious capital is playing the passive indexing game. While the Vatican and Ensign Peak are parking billions in algorithms and collecting those 18 percent returns, there is another group using faith based investing in a radically different hands on way.
(16:21 – 16:29)
You’re talking about the shareholder activists. Yes. We’re back to the Benedictine nuns of Mount St. Scholastica Monastery in Atchison, Kansas.
(16:29 – 16:49)
There are about 80 nuns living there and they are taking on the boards of Silicon Valley directly. And their approach flips the script entirely to file a formal shareholder resolution, which is a legally binding mechanism that forces a company’s board of directors and all its shareholders to vote on a specific issue. You don’t need a billion dollars.
(16:49 – 17:01)
You only need a minimum continuous investment of two thousand dollars in that company. That two thousand dollars acts like a Trojan horse. It doesn’t matter that they are a small monastery in Kansas.
(17:02 – 17:19)
That minimum investment gets them inside the boardroom gates where the executives legally cannot ignore them. It’s brilliant. And over the last 20 years, these 80 nuns have utilized that Trojan horse to submit over 350 shareholder resolutions to some of the most powerful corporations on the planet.
(17:19 – 17:32)
And their targets are heavyweights, man. They’ve gone after Amazon, demanding strict transparency on their political lobbying expenditures. They’ve pushed Google and Alphabet for aggressive ethical oversight on artificial intelligence development.
(17:32 – 17:39)
They don’t mess around. They really don’t. They’ve urged Chevron to create an independent commission to review their human rights policies globally.
(17:39 – 17:54)
They’re even calling out Netflix, demanding better boardroom diversity and stricter ethics codes. Sister Rose Marie Stahlbommer, who helps spearhead this initiative, she articulated their investment thesis beautifully. She noted that they actively look at companies with child labor issues.
(17:54 – 18:09)
They scrutinize employment policies and they evaluate whether a CEO is hoarding a massive amount of the profits rather than sharing it with the workers who actually generated it. Yeah, that quote really stood out to me, too. For the nuns, the defining metric isn’t the quarterly profit.
(18:10 – 18:20)
It is the human element. The human element. That is such a stark, refreshing contrast to the algorithms and the passive index funds just defaulting into tech stocks.
(18:20 – 18:28)
And these women are fearless. Look at 85-year-old Sister Barbara McCracken, who leads the corporate responsibility program for the monastery. She’s a force of nature.
(18:29 – 18:48)
Truly. The data highlights how she literally marched into her local state attorney’s office to challenge legal rulings regarding immigrants that the nuns felt were unjust. I mean, if you’re an 85-year-old woman, willing to take on a state attorney face to face, challenging the board of directors at Google is just another Tuesday morning for you.
(18:49 – 19:05)
They are utilizing the cold, hard mechanics of capitalism to enforce their spiritual worldview. Now, it is important to note the reality of corporate governance here. None of their 2024 or 2025 resolutions actually won the majority of shareholder votes.
(19:05 – 19:18)
Right. But that’s the mechanism that really struck me, because it fundamentally doesn’t matter that the votes didn’t pass today. The leverage they create with that initial $2,000 investment forces the conversation onto the official record.
(19:18 – 19:29)
Absolutely. It makes it public. And as the nuns pointed out, eventually, these massive corporations get tired of the public pressure and they start coming to them to ask for input on what their human rights policy should look like moving forward.
(19:29 – 19:37)
Because, as the monastery puts it, they are in this for the long haul. Right. A tech CEO is worried about surviving the next quarterly earnings call.
(19:38 – 20:07)
These nuns operate on a timeline of generations. Which brings this entire phenomenon full circle, really. A modern tech company names itself after an immortal god to project an illusion of permanence.
But these activist nuns actually embody that permanence inside the boardroom. So what does this all mean? If you step back and look at everything we’ve unpacked today, it’s clear that choosing a religious or mythological name for a business isn’t just a clever marketing gimmick you brainstorm on a whiteboard. No, not at all.
(20:07 – 20:27)
It’s a deeply rooted psychological play. It requires matching the utility of the industry, wisdom for health care, destruction for cybersecurity, fire for heavy manufacturing. It requires respecting the origin of the myth and deeply understanding the subconscious of your audience.
Because a name isn’t just a label. Exactly. It’s a promise to the consumer.
(20:27 – 20:59)
And as we’ve seen, it can also be a massive investment thesis. The modern corporate landscape, despite all its microchips and artificial intelligence, is still fundamentally tethered to our oldest human stories. From a Roman god of the forge casting metal parts in a factory, to the Vatican Bank benchmarking Catholic ethics against Silicon Valley’s outcome, to 80 nuns in Kansas forcing ethical A.I. oversight onto the agenda at Google, ancient belief systems are actively shaping the architecture, the ethics and the literal ownership of the modern corporate world.
(21:00 – 21:15)
It really makes you look at the apps on your phone in a completely different light. I want to leave you with one final thought to chew on today. We talked a lot about religious funds pouring billions into companies like Google, Meta and NVIDIA, the companies currently building the future of artificial intelligence.
(21:16 – 22:54)
If these massive A.I. systems are being trained on infrastructure funded heavily by religious portfolios, will the algorithms of tomorrow subtly reflect the ancient theologies of their biggest shareholders? Will the A.I. we use in 10 years have a bias shaped by the Vatican Bank or the LDS church? The ancient world isn’t just surviving in our stock market. It might be coding our future. Consumer, you.
