{"id":252,"date":"2026-05-15T00:45:05","date_gmt":"2026-05-15T00:45:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/supporttips.com\/media\/?p=252"},"modified":"2026-05-16T16:36:48","modified_gmt":"2026-05-16T16:36:48","slug":"podcast-26-38-money-in-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/supporttips.com\/media\/podcast-26-38-money-in-law\/","title":{"rendered":"ST Podcast on Where is the Money in Law ?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-text-align-center\">Listen Podcast on Where is the Money in Law ?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-audio\"><audio controls src=\"https:\/\/supporttips.com\/media\/file\/aud-st-podcast-26-38-money-in-law.mp4\" autoplay><\/audio><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Transcript<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>(0:00 &#8211; 0:24)<br>I want you to picture a wealthy lawyer, you know, go ahead and close your eyes if you have to. You&#8217;re probably seeing like the bespoke, perfectly tailored suit. Oh, absolutely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The classic image. Yeah, the sprawling corner glass office looking out over some city skyline. And of course, that dramatic spellbinding courtroom monologue right before the jury delivers this stunning verdict.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(0:24 &#8211; 0:32)<br>Right, the Hollywood moment. Exactly. It&#8217;s this cinematic, deeply ingrained image of what, you know, success in the legal world looks like.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(0:32 &#8211; 0:39)<br>It is. It&#8217;s a persistent Hollywood trope. But I mean, it completely obscures the actual mechanics of the industry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(0:39 &#8211; 0:47)<br>Because the reality is the people standing up in front of a jury, you know, making those passionate pleas. They&#8217;re rarely the ones capturing the lion&#8217;s share of the wealth. Right.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(0:47 &#8211; 1:08)<br>The true financial engines of the law, they operate entirely behind the scenes. So today, our mission for this deep dive is to basically shatter that cartoonish image. Because the reality of the United States legal services market is, well, it&#8217;s far more brutal, far more stratified, and honestly, vastly more fascinating than anything you&#8217;ll see on television.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(1:08 &#8211; 1:25)<br>Without a doubt. It&#8217;s a completely different world. We&#8217;re looking at a sprawling industry here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I mean, we&#8217;re talking about 1.37 million licensed attorneys as of 2025. Over a million people competing for a slice of an absolutely staggering pie. It&#8217;s an estimated $380 billion market today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(1:26 &#8211; 1:37)<br>And that&#8217;s projected to soar past $462 billion by 2030. Yeah. And what&#8217;s fascinating here is that, you know, when you look at that $380 billion pie, the legal profession operates nothing like a meritocracy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(1:37 &#8211; 1:46)<br>Right. It&#8217;s not like everyone gets a fair slice. Exactly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Not even close. It is a deeply stratified, highly unequal machine. So we&#8217;re just going to look at who makes the money today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(1:46 &#8211; 2:04)<br>We need to look at the underlying economic mechanisms of their practice areas, and really how the very nature of legal wealth is undergoing a fundamental shift right now. Yeah. So to figure out where the money actually is, we have to confront this profound divide between the top and the bottom of the profession.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(2:05 &#8211; 2:29)<br>Because the industry as a whole is booming, right? I mean, law firm industry-wide revenue surged 12.6% in 2025 alone. That&#8217;s a massive jump. Huge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But that surge is bypassing huge swaths of the workforce. If you look at the extreme, so the national average attorney salary right now is $176,470. Which, you know, sounds like a comfortable living on paper.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(2:29 &#8211; 2:38)<br>Right. It does. But if you&#8217;re a solo practitioner just starting out, opening your own storefront, you might be taking home anywhere from like $45,000 to $85,000.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(2:38 &#8211; 3:07)<br>Yeah. And that lower bracket, it barely covers the structural costs of entering the profession. Really? Just the cost? Oh, yeah.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I mean, think about it. Most of those newly minted lawyers are carrying, you know, hundreds of thousands of dollars in student loan debt. Oh, right.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Law school is notoriously expensive. Exactly. So they are taking on significant personal financial risk just to open their doors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>They&#8217;re often working nights and weekends just to keep the lights on, to grind. Wow. And then you contrast that $45,000 reality with the mega firms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(3:08 &#8211; 3:56)<br>The numbers coming out of the elite tiers are almost hard to comprehend. Like Kirkland &amp; Ellis made history in 2025 by becoming the first law firm ever to crack $10 billion in annual revenue. $10 billion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It&#8217;s just, it&#8217;s staggering. And their equity partners, they averaged a record $11.1 million each for one year of work. $11 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Because firm size dictates pay in this industry with like mathematical precision. A median equity partner at a small firm, meaning, you know, 100 lawyers or fewer, takes home a very respectable $387,000. Okay.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yeah. That&#8217;s good money. It is.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But a median equity partner at a large firm, one with 600 or more lawyers, leaps to $1.3 million. Wow. The larger the machine, the exponentially larger the payout.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(3:56 &#8211; 4:18)<br>Okay. Let&#8217;s untack this because looking at this data, the legal field isn&#8217;t really a single profession. It&#8217;s a lot like the hospitality industry, right? Okay.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I like that. How so? Well, you have your local diners, right? The solo practitioners serving the everyday public. The owner of that diner is essentially a short order cook.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>They only make money on the specific meals they personally flip. Right. They trade their time for a direct fee.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(4:18 &#8211; 4:39)<br>Exactly. But then you have multinational hospitality empires. The equity partners at a mega firm are like the owners of a global restaurant group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>They aren&#8217;t just getting paid for the legal briefs they write. They&#8217;re taking a percentage of the revenue generated by this massive army of junior associates working underneath them. They own the factory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(4:39 &#8211; 4:46)<br>That is a perfect analogy. That structural difference is everything. The business of law is fundamentally separating from the mere practice of law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(4:46 &#8211; 4:57)<br>Ah, the business versus the practice. Exactly. The elite tier, those global empires you mentioned, they are not serving everyday citizens.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>They are servicing institutions. It is a B2B or business to business model. Right.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(4:58 &#8211; 5:26)<br>When a multinational corporation is executing a merger, the legal fees are just a tiny line item on a corporate balance sheet. The B2B sector taps into corporate operating budgets, which are essentially limitless compared to, say, an individual citizen&#8217;s checking account. Yeah.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Because that institutional money is practically limitless, the actual legal work that generates the most revenue is, well, it&#8217;s entirely structured around protecting corporate assets. You follow the demand, you find the money. Precisely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(5:26 &#8211; 5:46)<br>So right now, corporate law is the fastest growing and most lucrative segment out there. We&#8217;re talking about mergers and acquisitions, private equities, securities, elite rainmakers, the partners who actually bring these multi-billion dollar corporate clients into the firm they&#8217;re pulling in $15 to $25 million a year. It&#8217;s unbelievable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(5:46 &#8211; 5:53)<br>And they are billing at an average of $11,114 per hour. Yeah. And an hourly rate like that requires serious justification.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(5:54 &#8211; 6:01)<br>I mean, I would hope so. Right. But in the eyes of their corporate clients, the return on investment is undeniable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(6:02 &#8211; 6:16)<br>Think about it. If an M&amp;A lawyer catches a single hidden liability in a contract or, you know, navigates a regulatory hurdle that saves a corporation $50 million in a merger. Oh, then paying $1,000 an hour is just a rounding error.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(6:16 &#8211; 6:22)<br>Exactly. It&#8217;s nothing. You are paying for risk mitigation at the highest possible stakes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(6:22 &#8211; 6:43)<br>Man. And that corporate tier is so lucrative that it trickles all the way down to the starting salaries too, right? Like the industry benchmark for elite firm pay is known as the Kravath scale. Yes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The famous Kravath scale. Under the scale, a first-year associate fresh out of law school and barely 25 years old makes $225,000. Huge starting salary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(6:43 &#8211; 6:58)<br>But it&#8217;s incredibly exclusive, isn&#8217;t it? Only 32% of first-year associates actually secure that starting salary. The rest are just completely shut out of that tier. They are.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And it&#8217;s worth noting those 25-year-olds are also trading their lives for that salary. Oh, for sure. They are the engine of that factory you mentioned earlier.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(6:58 &#8211; 7:07)<br>They&#8217;re often billing 80 to 100 hours a week to generate the revenue that funds those $11 million partner payouts. Yeah. No sleep for the associates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(7:07 &#8211; 7:21)<br>None at all. And while corporate law is the fastest growing, litigation is actually still the largest single revenue generating segment in the U.S. legal market. It accounted for nearly 30% of all industry revenue in 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(7:21 &#8211; 7:49)<br>Wow. 30%. Yeah.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I mean, a litigation powerhouse like Quinn Emanuel reported $2.7 billion in revenue for 2025. And their partner profits pass the $9 million mark. But again, this isn&#8217;t courtroom drama.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It is high-stakes commercial warfare for corporations. Right. And within that warfare, specialization has become the ultimate weapon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We&#8217;re seeing this profound tech and intellectual property boom. Oh, absolutely. The IP space is wild right now.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(7:49 &#8211; 8:07)<br>Yeah. If you&#8217;re an IP lawyer and you have a hard technical background, like you have a degree in engineering or computer science or the life sciences you command, a 14% to 18% lateral salary premium over a general practitioner. Because the market is just desperate for people who can actually understand the underlying technology.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(8:07 &#8211; 8:32)<br>Yeah. Specialists in AI, cybersecurity, and antitrust, they&#8217;re seeing salary premiums of up to 25%. Well, yeah.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I mean, litigating a patent dispute over a complex algorithmic architecture or like a new semiconductor design that requires a lawyer who understands the underlying math just as well as the law. Right. You&#8217;re not just hiring a lawyer, you&#8217;re hiring a highly specialized translator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(8:32 &#8211; 8:47)<br>Exactly. The premium pays for that rare intersection of legal acumen and scientific knowledge. That makes total sense.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Now, there&#8217;s another dynamic here that dictates firm revenue, and that&#8217;s the cyclical nature of these practice areas. Yes. The economic cycles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(8:47 &#8211; 8:57)<br>So real estate law, for example, is highly cyclical. When interest rates are low and the economy is booming, real estate partners at large firms pull in healthy seven-figure incomes. They do.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(8:57 &#8211; 9:36)<br>But countercyclical practices like bankruptcy restructuring or labor and employment law, they actually thrive during economic downturns. Boutique restructuring partners can make anywhere from $500,000 to well over $2 million when the economy goes south. It&#8217;s true.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The worse the economy does, the better they do. Wait, I have to push back on this a little bit. If bankruptcy and employment dispute practices boom when the economy tanks and M&amp;A booms when the economy thrives, does that mean large diversified law firms are essentially recession-proof? Like, are they just betting on both sides of the economic coin? You know, if we connect this to the bigger picture, this is a very deliberate strategy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(9:37 &#8211; 9:59)<br>Really? Oh, absolutely. It is classic portfolio management. A 1,000-lawyer firm will intentionally build a robust M&amp;A practice to capture the windfalls during economic booms, right? But they will also maintain an elite bankruptcy and restructuring wing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It&#8217;s like running an HVAC company. You make your money installing air conditioners in the summer and fixing furnaces in the winter. Ah, I love that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(9:59 &#8211; 10:48)<br>So when a recession hits, the M&amp;A deal flow dries up, sure, but the firm&#8217;s revenue doesn&#8217;t crash because the bankruptcy wing suddenly kicks into overdrive, handling all that corporate fallout. By balancing cyclical and counter-cyclical practices, these institutions just ensure continuous growth regardless of the macroeconomic climate. That is wild.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>They literally hedge against the economy itself. Exactly. But, okay, we need to step away from the corporate titans for a minute and look at the base of the pyramid, the lawyers who actually serve the general public.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This brings us to what&#8217;s called the access to justice paradox. A very different world. Completely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Where geography dictates your worth just as much as your practice area. So according to the data, Washington, D.C. leads the country with an average attorney salary of $238,990. Right.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(10:49 &#8211; 11:18)<br>But if you go to states like Montana or South Dakota, the average drops below $90,000. That is a nearly 180% gap. Yeah.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And that geographic disparity maps perfectly onto the BD versus BDC divide we talked about. Oh, interesting. How so? Well, D.C. and New York are regulatory hubs, right? They&#8217;re headquarters for massive corporations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So you have a high concentration of institutional B2B legal work. Yeah. But Montana, for example, has a much higher concentration of consumer-facing B2C practices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(11:19 &#8211; 11:25)<br>Oh, I see. And those B2C lawyers are handling, what, family law, criminal defense, immigration. Exactly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(11:25 &#8211; 11:36)<br>These attorneys form the widest base of the profession and are essential to the concept of access to justice. But they operate on fundamentally different economics. I mean, this is a volume game.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(11:36 &#8211; 11:49)<br>It is a grueling one. Yeah. These lawyers consistently fall below that national median pay of $176,000 because their revenue is strictly capped by what individual everyday citizens can afford to pay out of their own pockets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(11:49 &#8211; 11:55)<br>Right. Because you cannot bill an individual facing a divorce or an immigration hearing $1,000 an hour. God, no.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(11:56 &#8211; 12:17)<br>The market simply will not bear it. These attorneys have to take on an immense volume of cases just to stay afloat, often starting at that $45,000 to $85,000 range we mentioned. But there is one major exception in the consumer-facing world, isn&#8217;t there? The one area where elite-level wealth actually exists for lawyers serving regular people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(12:17 &#8211; 12:31)<br>Yes. Plaintiff-side personal injury. Right.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Because they don&#8217;t bill by the hour. They operate on contingency fees. The lawyer takes the case for free, but takes a percentage usually around a third of the final settlement or verdict.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(12:31 &#8211; 12:59)<br>And that changes everything. It really does. Top performers in this field routinely earn seven figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>About 34% of solo attorneys earn more than $250,000 a year. And the top contingency earners are heavily driving that statistic. Because it is a completely different financial mechanism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Instead of selling your time, you are essentially taking an equity stake in the outcome of the lawsuit. Here&#8217;s where it gets really interesting. You can almost compare the contingency fee model to venture capital.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(12:59 &#8211; 14:03)<br>Oh, yeah. That&#8217;s a great way to look at it. Right.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Like a plaintiff&#8217;s lawyer might fund 99 dry hole cases out of their own pocket cases that settle for very little or just lose completely at trial. And they cover all the filing fees, the expert witnesses, the travel. All of it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And they do it hoping to hit that one unicorn settlement that pays out millions. They absorb all the upfront financial risk for the chance at this life changing payday. But, you know, the pursuit of that unicorn payday is starting to face some severe pushback from the courts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The tension between funding consumer justice and just, well, excessive profiteering is reaching a boiling point. Really? Like judges are stepping in. Oh, absolutely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Consider this recent landmark case devolving a $10 billion settlement for First Nations communities. The legal team operating on a contingency model requested a fee of $510 million. Wait, half a billion dollars for a single case? Exactly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Half a billion. Oh, my God. But the presiding judge stepped in and slashed that $510 million fee down to just $23 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(14:03 &#8211; 14:59)<br>Whoa. Yeah. And the court stated rationale was specifically to prevent a windfall of generational wealth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Courts are increasingly scrutinizing these payouts, questioning whether taking hundreds of millions of dollars from a victim settlement is truly about providing access to justice or if it crosses the line into sheer opportunism. That is an astonishing haircut. $510 million down to $23 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But wait, if judges are suddenly capping the upside of those massive contingency payouts, plaintiff lawyers have a serious cash flow problem, don&#8217;t they? A huge one. Because they still need to fund those 99 dry holes. But the lottery ticket they were relying on is just gone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So who steps in to front the cash? And that cash flow problem opens the door to the most disruptive trend in the entire legal industry right now. The money in law is no longer strictly reserved for lawyers. We are seeing the financialization of the lawsuit itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(14:59 &#8211; 15:04)<br>Meaning Wall Street is literally meeting the courtroom. Precisely. Through the rise of legal finance and litigation funding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(15:04 &#8211; 15:39)<br>OK, break this down for me. So third parties outside investors are now bankrolling lawsuits. They pay the exorbitant fees and court costs for a plaintiff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And in exchange, they get a slice of the final settlement. Wow. They are treating lawsuits as a global asset class, just like stocks, bonds or real estate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And the sheer scale of this new market is staggering. It was valued at over $20 billion in 2025. $20 billion? Just investing in lawsuits? Yep.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And projections suggest it will skyrocket. Some estimates are saying $41 billion by 2030 and others project $51 billion by 2036. That&#8217;s insane.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(15:39 &#8211; 15:58)<br>It changes the entire structural paradigm. The traditional model was a closed loop, right? A client pays a lawyer and the lawyer provides a service. Now, you have hedge funds and specialized private equity firms inserting themselves into that loop, providing non-recourse loans or buying equity in the legal claim itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(15:58 &#8211; 16:20)<br>Oh wait, I have to stop and ask about the incentives here. Go for it. If hedge funds or third party investors are treating lawsuits like stock picks, doesn&#8217;t that incentivize dragging out conflicts? If an investor needs a 20% return on their investment to satisfy their shareholders, are they going to push the lawyers to reject a reasonable early settlement and force a drawn out trial just to chase a bigger payout? It&#8217;s a very real concern.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(16:20 &#8211; 16:34)<br>Are we gamifying the justice system? This raises an important question. Your concern goes straight to the heart of what legal ethicists are debating right now. This unbundling completely shifts the traditional law firm partnership model.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(16:35 &#8211; 16:55)<br>Historically, the lawyer&#8217;s singular fiduciary duty was to their client&#8217;s best interest. But when a $50 billion global asset class is footing the bill, the economic incentives of the legal system fundamentally change. On one hand, it allows underfunded plaintiffs to fight multinational corporations they could never afford to fight otherwise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(16:55 &#8211; 17:07)<br>Sure, it levels the playing field. Exactly. But it also means the strategy might be dictated by a spreadsheet in an investor&#8217;s office, prioritizing ROI rather than what provides the most peace or closure for the actual victim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(17:08 &#8211; 17:24)<br>Wow. So what does this all mean? We started by looking for the money in law, and we&#8217;ve gone from solo practitioners making $45,000 to hedge funds pouring billions into litigation. If there is one thing to take away from all these numbers, it&#8217;s that the money in law isn&#8217;t found in a dramatic courtroom monologue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(17:25 &#8211; 17:27)<br>That&#8217;s just the cartoon. Right. It&#8217;s a myth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(17:27 &#8211; 17:43)<br>The real money is hidden in B2B corporate structuring. It&#8217;s dictated by geographical concentration, whether you&#8217;re working in a D.C. regulatory hub or a South Dakota consumer market. It&#8217;s driven by hyper-specialization, like having a computer science degree to fight a semiconductor patent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(17:44 &#8211; 18:00)<br>And increasingly, the big money is being made through the sheer financialization of the lawsuits themselves. It really forces us to look at the system through a completely different lens. And I&#8217;d like to leave you with a final thought to ponder, building on this rise of litigation funding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(18:00 &#8211; 18:28)<br>Please do. As billions of dollars of outside investment pour into the legal system, who is the lawyer&#8217;s true master? If a lawsuit strategy, when to settle, when to fight, what arguments to make is increasingly dictated by an outside investor seeking a high return rather than a plaintiff seeking justice, we have to ask a difficult question. Is the legal system still a mechanism for finding the truth, or has it simply become another Wall Street derivative market? Man, that is an incredibly mind-bending thought.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(18:28 &#8211; 18:41)<br>It completely changes how you view the entire justice system. Well, thank you for joining us on this deep dive into the real economics of the legal world. The next time you picture a wealthy lawyer, forget the bespoke suit and the courtroom monologue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(18:41 &#8211; 18:48)<br>Picture a corporate portfolio manager balancing cyclical market trends and hedge fund investments. Until next time, keep questioning the cartoon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Source<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-wp-embed is-provider-support-tips wp-block-embed-support-tips\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qbmYtoUSgv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/supporttips.com\/news\/where-is-the-money-in-law\/\">Where Is the Money\u00a0in Law?<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; visibility: hidden;\" title=\"&#8220;Where Is the Money\u00a0in Law?&#8221; &#8212; Support Tips\" src=\"https:\/\/supporttips.com\/news\/where-is-the-money-in-law\/embed\/#?secret=ql7xufuWNF#?secret=qbmYtoUSgv\" data-secret=\"qbmYtoUSgv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Listen Podcast on Where is the Money in Law ? Transcript (0:00 &#8211; 0:24)I want you to picture a wealthy lawyer, you know, go ahead and close your eyes if you have to. You&#8217;re probably seeing like the bespoke, perfectly tailored suit. Oh, absolutely. The classic image. Yeah, the sprawling corner glass office looking out [&#8230;]\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-252","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-podcast"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/supporttips.com\/media\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/supporttips.com\/media\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/supporttips.com\/media\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/supporttips.com\/media\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/supporttips.com\/media\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=252"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/supporttips.com\/media\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":285,"href":"https:\/\/supporttips.com\/media\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252\/revisions\/285"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/supporttips.com\/media\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=252"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/supporttips.com\/media\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=252"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/supporttips.com\/media\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=252"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}